Testo 650 /



+ durable industrial design
+ battery voltage indicator
Navigation: Water activity
  What is water activity
  Test Introduction
Test details
  Salt solutions used
  Calibration samples used
  Desktop instruments
  Portable instruments
  Desktop instruments
  Decagon AquaLab 3TE
  Novasina LabMASTER-aw
  Rotronic HygroLab 2
  Portable instruments
  Decagon PawKit
  Rotronic HygroPalm
    Testo 650
  Desktop instruments
  Portable instruments
- significant instability
- results outside specification
- inadequate manual
- extra charge for calibration
Links Testo
Testo 650
probe 0628.0024
Swe.agent Nordtec
Price € ~ 2 400
Accuracy 0.01 aw
Range 0 - 1.000 aw
Instructions Optional
Samples Optional
Own media ?
Manual Yes, inadequate
in Swedish No
Yes, with
optional software

The device is sold as two sepa-
rate parts. The instrument Testo
650, that may also be used for
other purposes, and the sensor

The design submitted a feeling
of high industrial quality. Lots of
metal and well dimensioned
plastic gave weight and an
instrument that appeared to
deliver also in tough environ-
ments. After completion of mea-
surements, during instrument
power down, the battery voltage
was displayed.

The manual for the instrument Testo 650 covered a lot of features for
the instrument, like e.g. attaching an optional printer. No information
about the use of the probe 0628.0024 was however included.

Both instrument and sensor were delivered with calibration certificates. For further validations, instruc-
tions of how to calibrate the instrument was only supplied after buying a calibration kit (about € 220).

Measurement results
The measurements were easily accomplished. The results were, however, disappointing.

As seen in the diagram below, the results varied significantly for NaCl (0.755 aw). For each
measurement series the read result increased by more than 0.01 aw. Additional measurements
and other salt samples confirmed this behaviour. The results for NaCl samples varied between
0.771 and 0.791. Resting the sensor for 6 days gave 0.772 for a NaCl sample. It appears that
other phenomena than sensor saturation were responsible for the result variations.

At aw values higher than 0.97, the results were unreliable, in spite of the stated measurement
interval 0 - 1.000 aw. A cut-off in the instrument showed the result 0.999, irrespective of sample
aw = 0.975, 0.996 or 1.000. The cut-off gave a maximal error in the three samples of 0.024,
0.003 and -0.001, respectively. The apparent low deviations at aw higher than 0.95 in the
diagram shown below are hence not true observations but results of this cut-off.
      Deviation versus aw for Testo 650 with measure-
ment cell 0628.0024 in three measurement series.
  Test of HygroPalm   aw instrument test introduction      
  Test of PawKit   Summary - Portable instruments EminTech Start Page